Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 00943
Original file (BC 2009 00943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00943 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 6C (Automatically 
generated by the Military Personnel Data System (MILPDS) 
12 months prior to ETS — Member has not been interviewed by 
Commander in accordance with ANG Instruction 36-2607) be changed 
to reflect 6B (Member has been selected to reenlist by Commander 
— Member voluntarily selects to be separated/discharged at 
expiration of term of service (ETS).) 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The accusations of him defrauding the government are not grounds 
to deny him reenlistment. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard (ANG) on 
24 Oct 01 for a period of six years. 

 

On 26 Dec 06, he was demoted to the grade of airman first class 
(E-3) in the Oregon Air National Guard (ANG) effective and with a 
date of rank of 24 Apr 06. 

 

He was released from the ANG in the grade of senior airman (E-4), 
on 23 Oct 07, for Expiration of Enlistment with an honorable 
discharge characterization and an RE code of 6C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely. 

 


3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant 
changing the applicant’s RE code. In this respect, we note the 
applicant was assigned an RE code of 6C, which indicates the RE 
code was automatically generated by MILPDS 12 months prior to his 
expiration term of service. It appears his RE code should have 
been updated prior to his separation; however, based on an 
administrative error, this action was not taken. Further, since 
there is no evidence the applicant was denied reenlistment by his 
commander, we believe his RE code should be changed to one that 
would provide him an opportunity to reenlist should he choose to 
do so. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the 
extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of 
his discharge from the Air National Guard on 23 October 2007, he 
was issued a reenlistment eligibility code of “6B”. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2009-00943 in Executive Session on 26 Jan 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 09. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00943

    Original file (BC-2009-00943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00943 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 6C (Automatically generated by the Military Personnel Data System (MILPDS) 12 months prior to ETS — Member has not been interviewed by Commander in accordance with ANG Instruction 36-2607) be changed to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02450

    Original file (BC-2006-02450.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02450 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of LBK (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03589

    Original file (BC-2012-03589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) and separation code of “JBK” (less than six years of active service), be changed to allow...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02705

    Original file (BC-2005-02705.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02705 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Jun 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed so that he may enlist in the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03576

    Original file (BC-2002-03576.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states that since the applicant never enlisted with the --- ANG or any other ANG unit she cannot be re-instated. DPPRSR states that the PALACE CHASE program requires the member to sign a contract in which the member agrees to serve two times whatever is currently owed to the Air Force in an Air Reserve Component unit. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02768

    Original file (BC-2011-02768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After being successful in reenlisting in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he subsequently transferred back to his former unit with sufficient retainability for promotion; however, he was still not recommended for promotion. 2) His unit commander took him back on the basis that he would deploy and not be at the unit. However, since he was a member of the Air Force Reserve, the squadron commander of the unit he was assigned to (not the TDY commander) could have recommended him...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02320

    Original file (BC-2006-02320.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the inappropriate comment, HQ AFPC/DPPPEP agrees the comment must be corrected but not removed in its entirety. To remain fair to the applicant and to keep the report as accurate as possible, DPPPEP recommends the following changes: Section VI, Line 9, remove “perfect choice to bolster Nevada ANG ops.” Section VII, Line 5, remove “natural for Nevada ANG.” AFPC/DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02320

    Original file (BC-2006-02320.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the inappropriate comment, HQ AFPC/DPPPEP agrees the comment must be corrected but not removed in its entirety. To remain fair to the applicant and to keep the report as accurate as possible, DPPPEP recommends the following changes: Section VI, Line 9, remove “perfect choice to bolster Nevada ANG ops.” Section VII, Line 5, remove “natural for Nevada ANG.” AFPC/DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00586

    Original file (BC-2006-00586.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He checked back in September and was told the FY05 guidance had been received and his reenlistment bonus would not increase. As he was improperly advised on the amount of the bonus and the timing of his reenlistment, he requests his contract be re-accomplished under the FY05 ANG Incentive Program and he be awarded the additional $10,000 he would have received had he waited to reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02655

    Original file (BC 2010 02655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02655 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2X” (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the [Selected Reenlistment Program] SRP) be changed to “1J” (Eligible to reenlist, but elects separation). Although there is...